世界中の公法学者が協力して、一年間の各国における憲法判例の動
プロジェクト(いわばグローバル版重要判例みたなもの、2
以下のSSRN等のページからダウンロードできるファイルの174頁以下です。
http://www.iconnectblog.com/20
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/p
一部抜粋します。
Because this decision was entirely based on the specific facts of the
case, the range where it functions as a precedent will be very small. On the other hand, the
Supreme Court failed to show clearly the scope of application of
Article 49. Therefore, from now on, there is a possibility that such
ambiguity will make judges hesitate to express their views, and will
invite political intervention when they do. However, it may be
evaluated positively that the Grand Bench did not rely on the old
Sarufutsu paradigm in spite of being able to do so.